|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
P.C.
millennium club
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 2163
Location: Denmark
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:11 am Post subject: |
    |
|
Thanks
The important thing is how to respond , what is learned and if towers is realy the right answer. I do not think towers are, -- a new architecture, new jobs the true vision , progress and building somthing more relevant something that offer what the towers did not offer , ----- sadly that don't seem to become the "answer" .
But what could we expect --- as allway's "the answer" was to ask an architectural roadshow to provide exactly what was not the right answer, this thing soon turned into one stararchitect proving what a bore architecture became, spetacular towers just becaurse what was expected was something spetacular. High towers where a new architecture could have provided a wonder ,anything that could feed today's not critic architectural magazins, anything that could deal with architects acting like film stars, nonsense and dull talk from one end to the other the true prove about what architecture grown into --- the exact opposite of what that town need.
And you are right, --- the only conspiracy was about hiding why wtc7 went down so fast, a building so fragile it seem, a building like so many others build the same way. That was the real cover-up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
P.C.
millennium club
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 2163
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
What to learn and do better about how to respond to a building such as the old wtc7 collapsing ,even it was a seperate building not connected structuraly with the towers --- the fasion that come from it wasn't very exiting but the frightening thing ; that so much many other buildings, are performed exactly the same structuraly way, as the old wtc7 .
Ok they reinforced the crap way , hugend the trusses and cemented the girders ,but realy shuld that deliver the new architecture, was this an obvious "answer". I think not well, it's ok to next time build clumpsier and even more expensive still that's not progress that's digging trenshes compared a bold vision.
They say building codes been altered and _then everyting is as good as before, then now we have the story of wtc7 and the wrong answer being prepared, --- say what's that for an answer, why is it there couldn't be a wonder afterall ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
P.C.
millennium club
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 2163
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Architecture hopefully will not forever be tigh up in yestoday's way's of connecting steel beams into building structure beside, it's old technikes, they build like that way before computers. ------ today we hardly emagine how computer programs can do all the lazy work, calculate each and every building frame, for any fasion right out of the information in the 3D modeled designs , a computer generated building structure different from the rigid boxwork of older building structures ,those we are supposed to learn from that is the only right answer and maybe the reson for the focus on the towers, are to forget that stararchitects rather shuld develob the cheap new houses that architecture gone stray atleast what call themself stararchitects are way apart what shuld be the change of architecture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pwned
Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 2
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
blogger
del.icio.us
digg
slashdot
